支招托福写作 | 学术讨论范文（1）
支招托福写作 | 学术讨论范文（1）今天，新航道南京托福培训机构小编分享托福考试真题范文。每一篇范文都经过新航道的专业托福写作团队精心校审，并附有详细的范文点评、构思指导以及精选词汇和句子汇总，参加托福考试的同学们赶快学习起来吧！
完整版范文内容来啦
Question
Your professor is teaching a class on sociology. Write a post responding to the professor's question.
In your response, you should do the following.
- Express and support your opinion.
- Make a contribution to the discussion in your own words.
An effective response will contain at least 100 words.
Dr. Achebe
Recently, the town has decided to revoke the mandatory helmet-wearing rule for cyclists. This decision has sparked debate among residents. Some argue that it promotes freedom and convenience, while others express concerns about safety. Considering this, do you believe suburban governments should respond to citizens' demands to remove helmet regulations for cyclists? Why or why not?
Andrew
I support the removal of helmet regulations for cyclists. Wearing a helmet is cumbersome and inconvenient, discouraging people from cycling altogether. Removing this requirement would likely encourage more people to choose cycling as a mode of transportation, promoting healthier and more environmentally friendly lifestyles.
Claire
People should consider the implications of this policy. It's important to adhere to government regulations for safety reasons. Helmet laws are in place to protect cyclists from head injuries in case of accidents. So, even though some may view the removal of helmet regulations as promoting freedom, helmets keep you safe.
范文正文
I am inclined to agree with Claire’s view【提出我方立场的句型】 that the suburban government should not abolish helmet regulations, since they prevent riders from suffering serious injuries.【原因状语从句】 A helmet reduces the risk of severe head and brain damage by minimizing the impact of a force or collision to the head. Should cyclists have an accident and are not wearing a helmet, they are more likely to receive severe or fatal injuries.【虚拟语气】 According to the World Health Organization, head injuries resulting from bicycle and car collisions are a leading cause of death and disability. That is why it is essential for cyclists to wear a helmet.【表语从句】 Additionally, areas on the outskirts of a town have a high likelihood of car crashes. The reason is that when people drive on a road with low traffic density, they tend to accelerate subconsciously, raising the possibility of an accident and the danger of cycling in the suburbs.【非谓语动词作状语】 In this scenario, requiring cyclists to wear a helmet becomes even more necessary. Therefore, in order to safeguard the lives of residents, local councils in suburban areas should never allow the removal of helmet laws.
写作思路和特色
这道题是2024年5月18日的托福学术讨论真题。交通类话题在托福写作考试中经常出现，以往的角度通常涉及如何缓解交通堵塞或如何降低交通事故的发生率，但本次题目别出心裁，教授以一项交通安全法规为切入点，要求考生探讨郊区政府是否应遵从公众意见，撤销骑行时必须佩戴头盔的规定。
用词用语整理
I am inclined to agree with Claire’s view【提出我方立场的句型】 that the suburban government should not abolish helmet regulations, since they prevent riders from suffering serious injuries.【原因状语从句】
这句话中的be inclined to do sth表示“倾向于做某事”，经常用于在两个以上的立场中选择一方的情况。后半句用since引出原因。这是英语作文中的常见写法，体现出英语里先提出观点，后给出理由的思维方式。
【虚拟语气】
Should cyclists have an accident and are not wearing a helmet, they are more likely to receive severe or fatal injuries.
这句话使用了should前置的虚拟语气句型，表示对将来的虚拟，此时主句也可以像本句一样，用陈述语气。
【非谓语动词作状语】
The reason is that when people drive on a road with low traffic density, they tend to accelerate subconsciously, raising the possibility of an accident and the danger of cycling in the suburbs.
这句话使用了非谓语动词中的现在分词形式，写出了开车超速会提高骑行者的危险系数这一结果。
abolish v. 废除
通常指较为正式地废除一项制度或做法。
例句：The following year Parliament voted to abolish the death penalty for murder. 第二年议会投票废除对谋杀罪的死刑。
likelihood n. 可能性
可以用于替换probability, possibility, chance等。
car crash n. 车祸
traffic density n. 交通密度
表示在一条道路上车辆的密集程度。也可以替换为the volume of traffic(交通量)。
subconsciously adv. 下意识地，潜意识地
scenario n. 设想
表示可能发生的情况。由于前一句提到，在郊区开车可能容易超速，会增加骑行者的风险。本句因此将此情况概括为“scenario”，引出戴头盔的必要性。
safeguard v. 保障，保卫
语气偏正式，保护某物或某人意味着让他们不被伤害、丢失或虐待。
以上就是新航道南京托福培训机构小编分享的支招托福写作 | 学术讨论范文（1）的全部内容，大家可以参考一下，更多有关托福备考的问题，可以咨询新航道托福老师哦~
