雅思大作文7分范文及解析：老师是否应该能决定教学内容
雅思大作文7分范文及解析：老师是否应该能决定教学内容
观点类大作文，教育类话题
The subjects and lesson contents are decided by the authorities such as the government. Some people argue that teachers should make the choice. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
题目来源：2009年8月13日雅思大作文
1
题目大意
科目和课程内容由政府等当局决定。有些人认为教师应该做出选择。您在多大程度上同意或不同意?
2
思路解析
这是一道观点类，聊的是教师对课程内容能否选择的问题。审题时注意一点，题目中句话为背景句，不需要去讨论它的对错，重点在于老师是否能够“make the choice”，下面王珍老师带大家一起来看下具体观点。
首先来看同意的角度，有两方面。
一是能够满足学生多样性需求，教师由于和学生接触时间更久，相较于政府等部门能够更加了解学生的个性化需求和背景，可以根据学生的不同特点和兴趣定制教学内容，从而提高学生的学习效率和兴趣。
二是能够及时提升教学创新，教师在教学实践中可能发现新的教学方法或内容，这种现场的创新和调整对于教育的进步至关重要。
再来看反对的角度，同样有两个切入点。
一是违背教育公平性以及导致教育质量不可控。由于老师个体之间存在差异，很难保证输出同样的内容，因此政府统一制定教学大纲可以确保不同地区、不同学校之间的教育内容具有一致性，减少教育资源不均的问题，并且可以通过制定统一的教学标准和评估系统来保证教育质量。
二是老师制定教学内容可能会存在短视的问题。国家层面的教育规划通常与国家发展战略密切相关，比如培养特定的行业人才，政府制定的教学内容能够更好地服务于国家的长远目标和社会需求。
总结来说：教育是国家软实力重点，是国家人才战略的实施手段。因此，教学内容如果大部分被老师自己决定，那么一定会存在极大的差异性，并且，由于教师们不见得熟悉国家政策与未来战略，他们的选择可能出现偏差。但是我们承认，少量的自由选择能让最熟悉学生的老师们提供适合学生的拓展练习，对学生是非常有益的。
3
提纲
4
高分范文示例
In numerous countries, a standardized curriculum has been integrated into their educational frameworks. Yet, there exists a burgeoning debate suggesting that the onus of curriculum development should rest with educators rather than governmental bodies. While I acknowledge the merits of entrusting teachers with this responsibility, I firmly believe that the ultimate decision should reside with the governing authorities.
Educators possess a unique vantage point, being directly involved in the dissemination of knowledge. The curriculum set forth by governmental entities often stems from a broader perspective, emphasizing the nation's holistic development. Here, education is perceived as a pivotal instrument for bolstering the national economy and fortifying societal stability. Such a curriculum, governed by overarching national objectives, often aims to mould students into competent citizens and workforce members, potentially sidelining their individual nuances. On the other hand, educators, with their proximity to students, might be better positioned to tailor curricula that align more closely with students' innate aptitudes. This could foster a more diverse curriculum, thereby nurturing students' individual growth and fostering creativity.
Nevertheless, it's imperative to recognize that curricula endorsed by authorities are typically the culmination of insights from educational experts, buttressed by years of empirical evidence. Such curricula have been instrumental in shaping myriad talents globally. While an educator-driven curriculum might enhance diversity, it could compromise the holistic nature of education, inadvertently omitting fundamental knowledge. Moreover, in the absence of a nationally endorsed standard, disparities in educational quality could emerge, leading to pronounced inequities among students from different institutions.
In conclusion, while the involvement of teachers in curriculum development is undeniably valuable, the prerogative should ultimately lie with governmental bodies to ensure a consistent, comprehensive, and high-calibre education for all students.
5
相关词汇和语法结构
integrated into 集成到
burgeoning debate 迅速增长的辩论
ultimate decision 最终决定
unique vantage point 独特的观点
dissemination of knowledge 知识传播
broader perspective 更广泛的视角
pivotal instrument 关键工具
fortifying societal stability 加强社会稳定
overarching national objectives 总体国家目标
mould students into 塑造学生成为
innate aptitudes 天生的才能
buttressed by years of empirical evidence 多年实证支持
educator-driven curriculum 教育者驱动的课程
enhance diversity 增强多样性
holistic nature of education 教育的整体性质
pronounced inequities 明显的不平等
involvement of teachers 教师的参与
prerogative should ultimately lie with 最终的特权应属于
以上就是新航道南京雅思培训机构小编分享的雅思大作文7分范文及解析：老师是否应该能决定教学内容的全部内容，大家可以参考一下，更多有关雅思考试的问题，欢迎咨询新航道老师。
