雅思大作文7分范文及解析：是否应该区别对待罪犯

　　雅思大作文7分范文及解析：是否应该区别对待罪犯

　　双边类大作文，犯罪类话题

　　Some people think that lawbreakers should be sent to prison. However, others think that better talents among those should be made to work. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

　　题目来源：2009年9月17日雅思大作文

　　1

　　题目大意

　　有些人认为违法者应该被送进监狱。然而，其他人则认为应该让这些人中更的人才发挥作用。讨论两种观点并给出你自己的看法。

　　2

　　思路解析

　　这是一道双边类大作文，聊的是区别对待有才能的罪犯问题。双边类大作文，需要对每个观点分别表达同意或反对，最终的结论就是我的立场，可以是中立(双方都同意或都反对)，也可以是单边支持某一方立场。审题时注意一点，题目有个明确讨论对象“better talents among lawbreakers”而非所有所有罪犯，因此需要就这个特定对象展开观点。下面，王珍老师带大家一起来看下具体内容。

　　首先来看前者观点的合理性，有三方面。

　　一是能够保证法律的公平性。犯罪者无论什么身份背景，都应该为他们的行为负责，并接受法律的惩罚。这样可以维护社会的公平和法治。

　　二是能够威慑潜在犯罪。对于犯罪者的惩罚监禁，可以吓阻其他潜在犯罪者，减少他们认为可能逃脱惩罚的幻想，从而降低犯罪率。

　　三是维护社会稳定。将危险的罪犯关押在监狱中有助于防止他们对社会造成威胁。此外，这也为受害者及其家属提供了一种安慰，避免他们因感到不公而采取私下报复行为。

　　再来看后者观点的合理性，有两方面。

　　一方面，可以程度地发挥这些人的潜力。一些罪犯可能具备特殊的技能或才能，社会投入了大量资源来培养他们，如果将他们关在监狱里，这些潜在的贡献可能会被浪费，相关领域的研究也可能受到影响。

　　另一方面，这也可能对个人和社会有利。将犯罪者重新融入社会并提供工作机会可以帮助他们改过自新，避免他们与社会脱节。此外，监狱系统需要大量的资源来维持，如果犯罪者能够通过工作等方式来弥补过错，可以减轻社会负担。

　　3

　　提纲

　　4

　　高分范文示例

　　In recent epochs, a discernible escalation in criminal activities has been observed across numerous nations, sparking a dichotomous debate regarding the most efficacious modes of punishment. One school of thought proposes incarceration as a paramount deterrent, while a divergent perspective advocates for the reformation and societal reintegration of those criminals possessing remarkable intellectual capabilities. This essay aims to provide a balanced analysis of these contrasting viewpoints.

　　Advocates for prison sentences as a universal punishment proffer several compelling arguments. First and foremost, stringent penalties act as formidable deterrents for potential malefactors. Knowledge of the grave repercussions linked to illegal conduct may dissuade individuals from engaging in illicit pursuits for material gains. Conversely, if these individuals evade punitive measures, the likelihood of recidivism increases, and their actions potentially engender a mimetic effect on others. Secondly, victims and their kin, grappling with profound psychological or physical trauma, derive solace from the incarceration of the perpetrators. The absence of such punitive measures might erode public trust in the judiciary, inciting citizens to take the law into their own hands. Lastly, the principle of equality before the law stipulates that regardless of one's intellectual prowess, everyone must bear the consequences of their actions. Failure to enforce this could engender societal instability, significantly undermining citizen's sense of security and overall well-being.

　　On the other hand, the notion of reforming and rehabilitating intellectually gifted criminals guilty of minor offenses is endorsed by some. This stance is underpinned by the recognition that nurturing exceptional talent requires substantial temporal and financial investment. Moreover, certain highly specialized individuals are irreplaceable in their respective fields. Hence, their potential contributions may outweigh their minor transgressions. For instance, a highly skilled physicist who breaches the law, if incarcerated, could inflict incalculable damage on the field of physics and the broader community. By contrast, allowing these individuals to continue their work could yield substantial societal benefits through their exceptional skills and extensive knowledge.

　　In light of the foregoing discourse, my conviction is that the decision to incarcerate criminals should be predicated on an evaluation of the societal impact of their misdemeanors. Those whose actions have significantly disrupted societal order should be confined to protect public safety and uphold justice. However, those with exceptional talent, demonstrating a willingness to amend their missteps through contributions in diverse fields such as science and technology, should be given the opportunity to atone for their actions through their work and service to the community.

　　5

　　相关词汇和语法结构

　　Discernible escalation 明显的升级

　　Dichotomous debate 二元论辩论

　　Efficacious modes 有效的模式

　　Paramount deterrent 至关重要的威慑

　　Divergent perspective 不同的视角

　　Compelling arguments 令人信服的论据

　　Formidable deterrents 强大的威慑

　　Illicit pursuits 非法追求

　　Engender a mimetic effect 产生模仿效应

　　Profound psychological trauma 深刻的心理创伤

　　Principle of equality before the law 法律面前人人平等的原则

　　Endanger societal instability 危及社会稳定

　　Rehabilitating intellectually gifted criminals 改造智力超群的罪犯

　　Nurturing exceptional talent 培养出类拔萃的人才

　　Minor transgressions 小过失

　　Inflict incalculable damage 造成无法计算的损害

　　Substantial societal benefits 大量的社会利益

　　Significantly disrupted societal order 严重破坏社会秩序

　　Confined to protect public safety 限制以保护公共安全

　　Opportunity to atone for their actions 弥补他们的行为的机会

        来源：雅思情报圈

        以上就是新航道南京雅思培训班小编分享的雅思大作文7分范文及解析：是否应该区别对待罪犯的全部内容，大家可以参考一下，更多有关雅思考试的问题，欢迎咨询新航道老师。